YOU WILL ALWAYS BE UNLOVED

by Mr. Mean-Spirited

 

I will not raise your spirits. I am not about to inspire you. I am not here to praise you. I do not propose to motivate you. I have no intention of making you feel better about yourself. My dear reader, I have no interest in leaving you with any good feelings whatsoever.

Just because you read my blog, I am not going to make a friend out of you. I am not about to hold your hand; I won’t pat you on the back, and you’re certainly not going to get a hug out of me.

I am not going to sugar-coat things. I am not going to tell you white lies. I am not going to whisper sweet nothings.
I only promise to show you things as they truly are. And then I am going to smear your face in it. I swear to rub the misery of life across your eyeballs.

You won’t be feeling any warm glow after you have read these postings. But you will know how things really stand. At a point in history when humanitarians will tell you anything just to make you feel better, I swear to reveal the awful truth, no matter how much you might suffer.  

You see, I’ll be the one to divulge what everyone else is keeping from you. The well-adjusted members of society do not have the guts to let you know how it is, but I’m going to give it to you straight: no one is ever going to love you.  I will say that again: you will never be loved. You are never going to be adored by anyone. Your kind is not exactly irresistible. There is not a soul on earth that will ever be devoted to a creature like you. I’m merely admitting what everyone else mutters under the breath.

Don’t trust me, go look at yourself in the mirror. Can you honestly think anyone could love the likes of you? Look at those blemishes on your face – do you really believe anyone could love that?

Do you really imagine that no one was watching what you did when you pulled that morsel of snot from your nose this morning? Do you really assume that no one has seen those shit stains on your underwear? Do you really suppose that no one observed what you did when you masturbated the other night?

Don’t you realize that your body odor is a bit pungent? Hasn’t anyone ever told you that they can smell you coming? Just take a whiff, if you still have any doubts.

You need to understand that you make some really pathetic noises when you sleep.

And you really think that no one knows what you’ve done? You know what you did that day – and everyone else can see it in your face as well. Frankly, you turn the stomach of the opposite sex as much as you nauseate yourself: deep down, you disgust yourself – and for good reason.

There are some human beings who are so repulsive that everyone else can see it in one glance – and that one glimpse reveals just how hideous you really are. There is a reason why people look at you like that. There is a reason why people whisper when you come around. There is a reason why bus passengers scoot over when you sit next to them. There is a reason why a cashier doesn’t want to touch your hand when returning your change. There is a reason why your friend didn’t invite you to their last party.

Sure, from time to time, so do-gooder might sniff-out how desperately you want to be loved – and tell you what you want to hear. But they will repeat how special you are only when they want to get something out of you. And a hopeless chump like you will fall for it. But once a humanitarian has extracted everything that they can from you, the will cast you aside like a piece of soiled toilet paper.  

Surely you must have suspected something. You must have questioned whether people were keeping something from you. Surely you must have wondered why all the people who were supposedly the closest to you would always hint and hit you up for something. Other humans can only stomach your presence when they have something of yours in their pocket.

Only a hopeless dupe believes it when a woman tells him that she loves him. Only a worthless slut believes a man when he tells her that she is special. A human who trusts other people only gets taken advantage-of by those closest to him.

It is one thing to be unloved, but only a pathetic dupe like you would be so needy that you are actually deceived by someone claiming to adore you. ‘Tis better to have never loved at all, than to be deceived by someone pretending to care about you. Better to accept that you will always be alone than to endure the inevitably of deception.

Now go look in that mirror and see if I am not right.

 

IMMIGRATION ALWAYS CREATES A POLICE STATE

by Mr. Mean-Spirited

 

 

 



When the ruling elite forces different cultures to live together, there is one thing that you will feel immediately: not escalating crime, not increased congestion, not expanding poverty – as much as sudden restrictions in individual liberty. When different races are deposited in the same city, there is one thing that you will sense instantly: the eyes of the secret police upon your back.

1. Ethnic hatred is inevitable. Let’s face reality: people don’t like each other no matter what. Different races are always going to hate each other: different tribal groups have loathed their neighbors throughout history, and different cultures are going to abhor one another to the end of time. Differing ethnicities are always going to despise each other. Whether you like it or not, two neighbors with oppositely colored skin are never going to get along. Tribes that fought each other for thousands of years of human history are not suddenly going to mingle and intermingle just because they have moved to a country with air-conditioning and indoor plumbing. The only way that a multicultural society can temporarily exist is for a totalitarian government to stifle this innate animosity.

2. Ethnic groups give preferences to blood relations. Every healthy clan is always going to give the benefit to members of their own tribe at the expense of outsiders. In any strong kingroup, the demands of blood take precedence over the laws of the host country. And since that alien populace is invading your homeland, that occupying population is far more vibrant and vigorous than your own native stalk. After all, there is something downright masochistic about assisting foreigners at your own expense. A public that weakens and impoverishes itself to come to the aid of exotic foreigners is on its last legs. Any immigrant group will flout local customs if they gain some advantage over the enfeebled majority.

Immigrants cross borders to take advantage of the people on the other side. Once the locals come to a fragile realization of this double-standard, the natives tend to develop a few resentments toward the aliens. The ruling elite will then use every resource of the totalitarian state to keep this antipathy and antagonism from flowering into bloodshed and butchery.

3. Ethnic mingling is unnatural. Forcing different people from all over the world to come to one spot and live together is abnormal, and this aberrant population mix will invariably result in social strain. The only way that government can prevent that tension from developing into violence is for the authorities to temporarily repress and oppress and suppress that healthy hostility toward outsiders. The minority will always resent the majority, and the natives will always be suspicious of the newcomers. Human beings are never going to get along with one another no matter how much diversity is forced upon them—and this normal and natural dislike is going to be expressed in terms of fists and bullets.

4. Ethnic tranquility is always short-lived. Authorities might well be able to fake a temporary calmness between the competing tribal groups by using a massive police state to hold these immigrant rivalries in check. But an ethnic truce is always transitory. That artificial bottling up of social passions will require ever-increasing amounts of totalitarian regulations and restrictions. Only a massive secret police network can hold a multicultural nation state together. Expanding diversity will inevitably result in enhancing governmental tyranny.

5. Ethnic mixing always increases the power of the police state. Terrorism is the immediate consequence when two distinct cultures are forced to dwell in the same geographic space. The ruling class will always try to put a stop to such cultural conflict with its secret intelligence system. For instance, right after the United States attempted to incorporate a massive flood of migrants from Eastern Europe in the early part of the 20th Century, the intelligence establishment launched the Palmer Raids against its own citizens. Just as refugees transform the cities with new ethnic restaurants and exotic palaces of worship, such a foreign influx also increases the number of secret police keeping watch.

As the demographics continue to change in the United States, individual liberty will proportionally decline. As minority population levels increase, there will be a corresponding rise in bureaucratic oppression. Whenever the authorities open the borders, the officials will invariably press down upon the traditional Americans with a heavy hand. The greater the multiculturalism, the greater the state surveillance. The greater the diversity, the greater the restrictions on free speech. The greater the “inclusiveness,” the greater the demands for political correctness. The more minorities on the city streets, the more the restraints on private gun ownership. The more the bureaucrats talk about tolerance, the more certain that the government will end up totalitarian. Diversity always ends up as tyranny.  

No matter how many terrorist acts are committed by the naturalized arrivals, the establishment will invariably direct its repression toward the victimized natives. No matter how fanatical the migrants, it will always be the host population that is required to be more tolerant. No matter how many crimes the aliens commit, the indigenous population will consistently suffer the blame. The governing liberals will use immigration as an argument for heightening their scrutiny over the indigenous citizens. Curiously enough, the ruling class will use the exact, same feel-good excuse for inflating immigration (“protecting families and saving children”) as the explanation for increasing police spying (“saving families and protecting children”).

 

The greater the multiculturalism, the greater the extent of government surveillance of the victimized majority. The greater the social differences, the greater the state spying. The greater the level of foreign immigration, the fewer civil liberties that will ultimately remain. Only a massive and mighty secret police network can prevent ethnic rivalry from turning into ethnic warfare. Migration always ends up consuming every bit of a country’s freedom.

6. Ethnic hostility is the mark of a vigorous culture. Ethnic rivalries are the antibodies of culture. Hatred is a social immune system of society. Xenophobia functions the same in the social organism as white blood cells in the body. Repressing racial hostilities only makes the nation sick. Multiculturalism is a sort of infection of the nation state. Diversity is not strength, but a social cancer. Around the time you see minorities on every street corner, you know the country is terminal.

7. Ethnic amalgamation can best be prevented by provoking ethnic animosity. The only way to repel multiculturalism is not to petition your legislative overloads (we all know what a waste of time it would be to ask the government bureaucrats to actually follow the Constitution), but the way to reject diversity is to treat immigrants with a continual hatred. The only way to renounce the liberal agenda is to respond with constant malevolence. Remaining mean-spirited is the only way to resist the altruists. Kindness is always acquiescence. The spiteful citizen always refuses humanitarian conformity.

 

DEADBEAT DADS ARE HEROES

by Mr. Mean-Spirited





No figure in modern America is more heroic than the deadbeat dad. The child-support resistor courageously struggles against the economic slavery of forced fatherhood. The deadbeat dad's brave refusal to pay makes him a freedom-fighter against the servitude of tyrannical responsibility. No matter how much the do-gooder might insist that a father has an obligation to the community, the deadbeat is one of the last surviving individualists who still value personal autonomy over social duty.  The deadbeat dad battles against financial servitude.

1. Deadbeat dads are the bravest souls in modern America. Look, the deadbeat dad understands all-too-well that no other individual is as despised as a man who refuses to support his children. The deadbeat dad obviously realizes that he will be heartily detested by decent society. Yet the deadbeat has the moral fiber to stick to his guns – and to withstand this extortion. These courageous individuals are well aware of what society does when a man dares to resist the do-gooders’ protection racket. Because the deadbeat dad questions the legitimacy of these shakedown artists, he threatens the cushy jobs of the whole child-protection establishment. There are billions of dollars in pension funds that are jeopardized by his bounced check.

Refusing to waste money on a worthless child takes considerable bravely in this day and age of near-compulsory parenting. Think of the deadbeat dad as a liberator crusading against the humanitarian's notion of financial duty. 

2. Child support payments would be wasted anyway. Surely if a slut is too dumb to get an abortion when some one-night-wonder knocks her up, then the breeder will obviously be too stupid to manage money—the mother would just blow any child-support on lottery tickets and meth anyway. Let's face it, if a dumb broad doesn't have the common sense to get rid of the pregnancy in the first place, then she isn't going to have the brains to raise a child properly. Things are going to turn out badly with the little bastard no matter how much money the bitch gets, so why even bother sending the whore a check? The deadbeat dad understand what really happens to money paid for child support.

3. Adults must take precedence over children. It is not likely that the kid is going to amount to anything anyway, so why waste any more money on the repulsive critter? Even if two parents were to raise the brat, it is rather doubtful that the parasite is going to make any contribution to civilization anyway, so why not cut your losses right now? The worthless bastard is not going to grow up and make any scientific advancement to American culture anyway. Better that an infant goes hungry than a father has to do without a six-pack.

4. Just because sperm was deposited in some slut’s cunt, a man shouldn’t be held liable for 18 years of financial payments. Once a gentleman has abandoned his semen, he should have no more concern about the consequences than he does when casting aside a used Kleenex. Being coerced into paying child support for the outcome of his spew makes about as much sense as a bloke having to purchase antibiotics because of a bacterial culture in his nasal drippings. A fertilized ovum has about as much cosmic importance as a gnat coated in snot. A new life has about as much value as anything else that comes out of the end of your dick. 

5. Children are worthless parasites. A deadbeat dad shows that everything the mass media says about offspring is sentimental bullshit. In an age of sanctimonious platitudes about the importance of children, the deadbeat demonstrates the real valuation of a kid. It is only fair that if the bastard was conceived as an afterthought, then the creature should be treated as an afterthought throughout life. True, it is not the brat’s fault he was an unwelcome accident, but unwanted kids are not worth anything anyway. A baby has just as much monetary worth as the amount of a deadbeat dad’s check: zero.

It takes a certain manliness to consecrate your life to your own amusement—and it certainly requires quite some testosterone to live your life without a thought about where your spermatozoa might swim. I've met plenty of wimpy fathers in my time, but a deadbeat dad is never going to be called a sissy. Think of the deadbeat dad as a beer-drinking ninja battling against totalitarian responsibility. Let us raise a shot-glass in admiration of the heroism of the deadbeat dad.

 

 

LIFE IS A ZERO-SUM GAME

by Mr. Mean-Spirited

Human life itself is a zero-sum game: whenever anybody else succeeds, you will be certain to fail. When there is an accomplishment, someone else must fall short. Although the concept of “zero sum” comes from the academic discipline of game theory, the notion is actually the best model of what really goes on in the real world: whenever someone wins, somebody else has to lose. On this earth, the success of one person is always offset by the defeat of another individual. Good luck for one participant will invariably mean pain for another. Whenever your neighbor gains, you will somehow always end up with less.

From basic political analysis, it is obvious that when one pressure group receives some benefit, the competing population ends up suffering. There is never any neutral act in society; if you don’t get anything, you have been victimized. If it does not benefit you, it weakens you. If it is not to your advantage, then it injures you.

The liberals would have you believe that they can design a government where everyone is as winner; the do-gooders would like to convince you that they have a plan where everyone can go home with a trophy. But things are never like that in this existence. Instead, in the real world, to have a victory, you must first have enough defeated. In genuine life, every winner turns you into a loser. Every success requires that there are plenty of failures. Each champion turns the rest of the population into also-rans. Every well-paid boss requires that he has enough poor workers to take his orders. For every player that wins at bingo, you must first have a room full of suckers with empty wallets. For every child that grows up to become president, you must first have enough taxpayers to rule over. For every son of God, you first need a bunch of people to on their knees to sing hymns.

Whenever someone else strikes rich, it is that much more likely you will remain poor. Whenever some immigrant gets a better life, your own standard of living will be proportionally worse. Whenever a stranger improves his life, your own existence will be all the more impoverished. Whenever you are competing for a job that you need so desperately, just remember that there is someone else who will always be more qualified than you. Whenever a friend comes into some money, you will have all the more difficulty making rent that same month. Whenever someone else finds a coin on the street, you will feel a hole in your pocket. Whenever somebody else gets another dollar, you will have four quarters less. Whenever someone, somewhere laughs, you will quickly come to realize that your own zipper is open. Whenever someone else is happy, you will end up feeling sad. There is nothing more annoying than someone else’s laughter—because their delight is always at your expense.

Surely there is nothing more damaging to the human spirit than the happiness of someone else. If you aren’t feeling any energetic enthusiasm these days, that is because someone has drained the psychic energy out of you. The only reason people ever come around you is to take something from you—and sometimes what they take is your exhilaration. Just as another human being can “sap your energy,” so another person can tap your enchantment just by looking at you. Your closest friend is always your greatest risk.

Every time that you see a couple together, there is one less soul-mate for you; every occasion that you see yet another pair of lovers with their arms around each other, your own life will be all the more empty. Every instance that a potential sexual partner gets married, that will mean one less encounter for you; every time that someone puts on a wedding band becomes one less opportunity for you. Every joyous relationship translates into just another romantic occasion that you have missed. Every night that some acquaintance does a bit of fucking, that only makes it all the more likely you will go to bed alone. That happier other people are with their lives, the more certain that the rest of your existence will be miserable.

If you ever want to get anything, you need to do one thing first—and that is to keep others from getting any. If you have a desire to win the lottery, you first need to sabotage the chances of other players. Happiness is not generated by making others happy any more than money is created by giving currency to beggars. The only way that you might find joy is to steal and seize that jubilation from someone else. In this world, there is not enough bliss to go around. Every triumph comes at the expense of someone else.

There are only so many slices of pizza: the more of the pie that is consumed by your neighbors, the less that will remain for you. In a metaphysical sense, there is only so much ecstasy on this planet—the greater the happiness of other people, the less that will remain for you. Only by hoarding your emotions can you preserve whatever passion might still remain. Only by making others feel distressed can you keep your own delight. If “misery loves company,” it is simply because the company of others has made you miserable. You must fight back—and make the other person uncomfortable first. If want anything out of life, you had better start by ruining your neighbor's chances.

Somebody in this life is always going to get hurt. Nothing you can do to change that. The basic pattern of life means that someone will always be harmed no matter what. The best that you can do is to make sure that the other guy always takes the hit—and not you.

There is only so much good fortune to go around in life. Someone else's joy always takes away from you. There is nothing as psychologically damaging to your own personality as someone else's good fortune. If another person gets lucky, you can be certain that there is misery headed toward you. A stranger’s good luck is going to make you grind your teeth and clench your fists. Other people’s happiness is a threat.

Someone else can only succeed at your expense. Someone else has already taken everything from you.

TOLERANCE IS A THREAT TO FREE THOUGHT

by Mr. Mean-Spirited


 


Tolerance is just a scam to get your complicity; tolerance is just a scheme to get your collusion. Just as a street gang will force every member to leave their fingerprints on a murder weapon, tolerance is just a deceptive way to get you to share the guilt. Tolerance is just a trick to get you involved in something that you know isn’t right.  

You are only required to be tolerant about something that isn’t true—only when things aren’t correct do the leaders demand acceptance. You know better than to be tolerant; being open-minded is just a ploy to get you to take the blame.  

Tolerance is a betrayal of your true self. A genuine individualist will always remain the most goddamn intolerant person that ever walked the earth. If you want to retain your independence of thought, you want nothing to do with tolerance. A man who knows, a man who really knows, a man who truly knows himself has no use for tolerance.

Tolerance is what the slave is expected to feel about his owner’s whimsies. Acceptance is what the servant is expected to display about his master’s orders. A free man always has his prejudices. Intolerance is the sign that a human being still remains an individualist.

 

 

 

THE POWER OF HATE

by Mr. Mean-Spirited

The most subversive act that you can wage against the liberal agenda is simply NOT to be a nice person.  What do-gooders fear most is not street violence—but what frightens these busy-bodies the most is the nagging suspicion that they might not be liked.  The most certain means of destroying the humanitarians is to treat them like the scum that they truly are.  The quickest way to resist an idealist is merely to be unkind.  The only way of dealing with an altruist is to respond with utter and unconditional hate.

What distinguishes a liberal from a conservative is not an opinion about some transitory political issue—what differentiates a communitarian from a realist are basic psychological predispositions.  The liberal personality has an overwhelming need to be liked by others; the idealist's fundamental problem with self-esteem shows a vulnerability that can be exploited.  By responding to a do-gooder with complete and continuous hatred—you are able to defeat the idealistic meddler.

A liberal remains excessively concerned with emotion because he is always driven by a desire to belong—the humanitarian is so concerned with the feelings of others because he just wants to fit in.  Sometimes the only way of surviving the last days of Western civilization is to make everyone miserable—and you can be damn certain that liberals will suffer the worst.

Misanthropy is the most unashamedly subversive act that you can wage against the establishment.  Hating your fellow man is the most counterrevolutionary thing that you can do against society.

Give love a chance?  Fuck that shit; love had its day and it failed.  I'd tell you to give hate a chance, but hate doesn't need anything from the likes of you; hate isn't going to wait around for a pansy like you to offer it a chance—hate is going to be front and center no matter what.  And despite the wish of wimps like yourself, hate will always win out in the end.

ALL CHARITIES ARE SCAMS

by Mr. Mean-Spirited



Do-gooders create the anguish that they are supposedly trying to cure—if the humanitarians can't find some poor unfortunate to help, then they will then make you suffer until you beg for assistance. The good Samaritans will always make you hurt enough until you get on your knees and ask for their charity. Altruists will invariably stick a knife in your back until you implore them for mercy. Benefactors will seize every last cent from your pockets until you plead for alms. The idealists will make you suffer until you promise to be better.

1. Charity perpetuates misery. In order for charity to exist, the do-gooders must first be certain to create enough misfortune. Poverty is caused by the very government programs that seek its eradication—after all, if impoverishment were ever truly eliminated, those well-paid bureaucrats would be the first to lose their jobs. In this way, social workers would be the last group that would ever want to eradicate hardship—a just society would mean the end of their paychecks. Humanitarians produce suffering in order to make themselves look virtuous. If a bureaucrat actually eliminated some injustice, he would put himself out of a job; but if the manager were to expand the injury, then the administrator would have done enough work to justify a promotion.

2. Charity expands and increases misery. No matter how much money you donate, charities always want more cash. Even if you were to give some non-profit everything you own, they would still tell you that you must do more. Since a charity can never claim success in eradicating some harm, they take an opposite approach and claim that hardship is growing. In order to give themselves a bonus and a better pension, the social worker has got to make the problem look worse. If poverty rates were to somehow decrease, then the charities would logically require less funding—and the percentage that could then be pocked by the administrators would then be woefully reduced. Only if the extent of the misfortune were to be ever-expanding might the humanitarians then be able give themselves the kind of lifestyle they believe that they deserve. Increasing misfortune means increased funding.

3. Charity perpetuates dependence. In order to make sure the caseworkers get a regular paycheck, they first need returning cases. If the charity could heal some sort of disease with a single tablet, they would put themselves out of business with their benevolence. Instead, the non-profit needs loyal regulars, not remedies. Charities don't require cures—as much as consumers. In order to get those repeat customers, a charity generates dependence among the population it supposedly helps.

4. Charity is a deliberate insult. The people running a charity have a psychological need to feel themselves superior to the unfortunates that they are supposedly assisting, so they need to make the citizens receiving handouts acknowledge their subservience. In order to get a free meal, the altruists make the beneficiaries humiliate themselves—and the bureaucrats believe that the act of humbling is for their own good. Only by demoralizing a dependent clientele can the charity be assured of repeat business.

5. Charity destroys the human spirit. Alms-giving damages the personality—not of the recipient, but of the financial donor. The motives of the administrators of a charity are understandable: sheer greed. The motivations of the needy are undeniable: utter self-interest. However, the altruists that provide the monetary contributions are acting out of a sort of guilty masochism.

The bleeding-heart feels righteous by harming himself. Ultimately, all charitable giving is psychologically damaging—destroying your personality by causing you to seek virtue in deeds that injure yourself. The more you give, the more you weaken yourself. Giving money to the "needy" is the financial equivalent of an adolescent girl slashing at a limb with a razor blade; both the do-gooder and the teenage cutter will do anything to their assets in order to stop feeling so empty. An act of charity is just economic self-mutilation. In the final analysis, donating to a charity will just make you feel that much more unfulfilled—and all the more unhappy when you finally see the gouges in your bank balance. Even if your charitable giving does not leave you completely impoverished, even if the highschooler's bloody wounds are not life-threatening—it still is unhealthy. There is something downright unhygienic about a person who needs to suffer in order to feel worthy.

6. Generosity is a moral failing. Kindness is a way of postponing the acceptance of your own true nature: human beings are innately self-centered. Benevolence, then, is not merely an attempt to impress others, but a way of deceiving yourself. Generosity prevents you from truly knowing yourself. Anything that keeps you from expressing your darkside is bound to have unfortunate consequnces in the long term.

Without a doubt, there is plenty of suffering in this life, but charity only makes it worse. To be sure, there is plenty of pain in this world, but the last people that are going to do anything about it are the humanitarians. The prime directive of a charity is to perpetuate the charity.

Ultimately, the only people that charity is going to help are the persons doing the helping. Volunteers do it to you for your own good.