TOLERANCE IS A THREAT TO FREE THOUGHT

by Mr. Mean-Spirited


 


Tolerance is just a scam to get your complicity; tolerance is just a scheme to get your collusion. Just as a street gang will force every member to leave their fingerprints on a murder weapon, tolerance is just a deceptive way to get you to share the guilt. Tolerance is just a trick to get you involved in something that you know isn’t right.  

You are only required to be tolerant about something that isn’t true—only when things aren’t correct do the leaders demand acceptance. You know better than to be tolerant; being open-minded is just a ploy to get you to take the blame.  

Tolerance is a betrayal of your true self. A genuine individualist will always remain the most goddamn intolerant person that ever walked the earth. If you want to retain your independence of thought, you want nothing to do with tolerance. A man who knows, a man who really knows, a man who truly knows himself has no use for tolerance.

Tolerance is what the slave is expected to feel about his owner’s whimsies. Acceptance is what the servant is expected to display about his master’s orders. A free man always has his prejudices. Intolerance is the sign that a human being still remains an individualist.

 

 

 

THE POWER OF HATE

by Mr. Mean-Spirited

The most subversive act that you can wage against the liberal agenda is simply NOT to be a nice person.  What do-gooders fear most is not street violence—but what frightens these busy-bodies the most is the nagging suspicion that they might not be liked.  The most certain means of destroying the humanitarians is to treat them like the scum that they truly are.  The quickest way to resist an idealist is merely to be unkind.  The only way of dealing with an altruist is to respond with utter and unconditional hate.

What distinguishes a liberal from a conservative is not an opinion about some transitory political issue—what differentiates a communitarian from a realist are basic psychological predispositions.  The liberal personality has an overwhelming need to be liked by others; the idealist's fundamental problem with self-esteem shows a vulnerability that can be exploited.  By responding to a do-gooder with complete and continuous hatred—you are able to defeat the idealistic meddler.

A liberal remains excessively concerned with emotion because he is always driven by a desire to belong—the humanitarian is so concerned with the feelings of others because he just wants to fit in.  Sometimes the only way of surviving the last days of Western civilization is to make everyone miserable—and you can be damn certain that liberals will suffer the worst.

Misanthropy is the most unashamedly subversive act that you can wage against the establishment.  Hating your fellow man is the most counterrevolutionary thing that you can do against society.

Give love a chance?  Fuck that shit; love had its day and it failed.  I'd tell you to give hate a chance, but hate doesn't need anything from the likes of you; hate isn't going to wait around for a pansy like you to offer it a chance—hate is going to be front and center no matter what.  And despite the wish of wimps like yourself, hate will always win out in the end.

ALL CHARITIES ARE SCAMS

by Mr. Mean-Spirited



Do-gooders create the anguish that they are supposedly trying to cure—if the humanitarians can't find some poor unfortunate to help, then they will then make you suffer until you beg for assistance. The good Samaritans will always make you hurt enough until you get on your knees and ask for their charity. Altruists will invariably stick a knife in your back until you implore them for mercy. Benefactors will seize every last cent from your pockets until you plead for alms. The idealists will make you suffer until you promise to be better.

1. Charity perpetuates misery. In order for charity to exist, the do-gooders must first be certain to create enough misfortune. Poverty is caused by the very government programs that seek its eradication—after all, if impoverishment were ever truly eliminated, those well-paid bureaucrats would be the first to lose their jobs. In this way, social workers would be the last group that would ever want to eradicate hardship—a just society would mean the end of their paychecks. Humanitarians produce suffering in order to make themselves look virtuous. If a bureaucrat actually eliminated some injustice, he would put himself out of a job; but if the manager were to expand the injury, then the administrator would have done enough work to justify a promotion.

2. Charity expands and increases misery. No matter how much money you donate, charities always want more cash. Even if you were to give some non-profit everything you own, they would still tell you that you must do more. Since a charity can never claim success in eradicating some harm, they take an opposite approach and claim that hardship is growing. In order to give themselves a bonus and a better pension, the social worker has got to make the problem look worse. If poverty rates were to somehow decrease, then the charities would logically require less funding—and the percentage that could then be pocked by the administrators would then be woefully reduced. Only if the extent of the misfortune were to be ever-expanding might the humanitarians then be able give themselves the kind of lifestyle they believe that they deserve. Increasing misfortune means increased funding.

3. Charity perpetuates dependence. In order to make sure the caseworkers get a regular paycheck, they first need returning cases. If the charity could heal some sort of disease with a single tablet, they would put themselves out of business with their benevolence. Instead, the non-profit needs loyal regulars, not remedies. Charities don't require cures—as much as consumers. In order to get those repeat customers, a charity generates dependence among the population it supposedly helps.

4. Charity is a deliberate insult. The people running a charity have a psychological need to feel themselves superior to the unfortunates that they are supposedly assisting, so they need to make the citizens receiving handouts acknowledge their subservience. In order to get a free meal, the altruists make the beneficiaries humiliate themselves—and the bureaucrats believe that the act of humbling is for their own good. Only by demoralizing a dependent clientele can the charity be assured of repeat business.

5. Charity destroys the human spirit. Alms-giving damages the personality—not of the recipient, but of the financial donor. The motives of the administrators of a charity are understandable: sheer greed. The motivations of the needy are undeniable: utter self-interest. However, the altruists that provide the monetary contributions are acting out of a sort of guilty masochism.

The bleeding-heart feels righteous by harming himself. Ultimately, all charitable giving is psychologically damaging—destroying your personality by causing you to seek virtue in deeds that injure yourself. The more you give, the more you weaken yourself. Giving money to the "needy" is the financial equivalent of an adolescent girl slashing at a limb with a razor blade; both the do-gooder and the teenage cutter will do anything to their assets in order to stop feeling so empty. An act of charity is just economic self-mutilation. In the final analysis, donating to a charity will just make you feel that much more unfulfilled—and all the more unhappy when you finally see the gouges in your bank balance. Even if your charitable giving does not leave you completely impoverished, even if the highschooler's bloody wounds are not life-threatening—it still is unhealthy. There is something downright unhygienic about a person who needs to suffer in order to feel worthy.

6. Generosity is a moral failing. Kindness is a way of postponing the acceptance of your own true nature: human beings are innately self-centered. Benevolence, then, is not merely an attempt to impress others, but a way of deceiving yourself. Generosity prevents you from truly knowing yourself. Anything that keeps you from expressing your darkside is bound to have unfortunate consequnces in the long term.

Without a doubt, there is plenty of suffering in this life, but charity only makes it worse. To be sure, there is plenty of pain in this world, but the last people that are going to do anything about it are the humanitarians. The prime directive of a charity is to perpetuate the charity.

Ultimately, the only people that charity is going to help are the persons doing the helping. Volunteers do it to you for your own good.

THE NECESSITY OF REVENGE

by Mr. Mean-Spirited



The desire for vengeance is the most noble emotion that can be experienced by the human soul. Revenge shows that you have resisted; revenge shows that you have refused to give-in; revenge shows that you have rejected the easy life of doing what you are told. Retribution demonstrates that you are still a free man.

1. Revenge is the purpose of life. There is no more noble life than devoting the rest of your existence to getting even. No matter how long ago you might have been slighted, you must devote the rest of you time on earth to getting revenge. There is no greater goal in life than vengeance. Retaliation is the only thing that makes you human.

2. Never forgive, never forget. Never dismiss, never disregard. Keep a record of each time you were unjustly treated; keep a chronicle of every suffering; keep a register of all the insults you have endured. The sheer number of affronts will quickly prove that your mistreatment is not a matter of bad luck, but that you have been subjected to a deliberate and designed pattern of torment. Once you realize the extent of everything you have had to withstand, you will recognize the necessity of plotting reprisal.

The bigger man does not forgive; instead, the bigger man does the better revenge.  The enlightened soul does not forgive; instead, he is remembered for the enormity of his retaliation.  The wise man ain’t no wuss.

3. Revenge is necessary for mental healing. No matter if you were victimized in childhood, the only way you are going to psychologically recover is to get even. No matter how many years ago you might have been abused, you must plot retribution. Never listen to those who tell you to forget: forgiveness is just the final stage of victimization; to "move on" is to give your oppressors their ultimate victory over you. In contrast, psychological healing is going to involve getting even with your enemies. A campaign of revenge is the only way that you are ever going to recuperate from being wronged. Vengeance is the only true closure.

4. Forgiveness is sick. A person who just wants to forget and go on with life is a wounded personality. There is nothing more evil than to just "get over it." There are certain people who abused over and over again in life, and it is precisely these mentalities that leave themselves open to the same pattern of victimization by forgiving and "moving on" with life.

You are not defeated by losing a fight; you are only overpowered when you have forgiven your enemies. The ultimate stage of subjugation is "turning the other cheek." The desire for revenge is the only sign that you still have some fight left in you.

5. The hypocrites who tell you to forgive are the same type of people who wronged you in the first place. When these do-gooders instruct you to turn the other cheek, they are merely trying to victimize you yet again. The same people who were on the student council throughout your school days are now the same characters who now tell you to forgive—and they still have that same smirk. People who insist on forgiveness have a covert agenda; their very lifestyle depends on you keeping quiet. The ruling class doesn't want anyone to "rock the boat" and upset their prosperity; after all, they got their plenty by taking advantage of people like you in their first place. The establishment has a vested interest in having you "turn the other cheek." The authority figures who now insist that you "put it behind you" are the very same types that wronged you in the first place. Society is always on the side of those who have harmed you; those sanctimonious moralists weren't ever around when you were being victimized.

6. It doesn't matter who you get even with; the important thing is the act of revenge. It doesn’t matter if you get revenge against the actual person who might have wronged you—what is important is just that you seek retaliation. It doesn’t matter if you extract vengeance upon a substitute target—there important thing is that you are seeking to put things right. What is vital is that you toss the boot into the machine; it doesn't matter who might be pushing the buttons at the moment. When you have been harmed, there are no innocent by-standers. Don't waste your time trying to track down the exact perpetrators who might have harmed you; the only important thing is that you discharge your retaliation upon a convenient target. When you extract vengeance, you get even with a class of people; you settle scores with the system that permitted this to happen. The establishment was not there for you when you were hurt in the first place; hence, you only put things right by working vengeance upon the institutions that callously failed you.

7. Revenge should be judged on the basis of ingenuity. The final target of a plan of retribution is not of such importance as the sheer cunning of the scheme. The more ornate the vindictiveness, the more potent the vengeance. Malevolence, not the target of opportunity, is what ultimately puts things right for the aggrieved. You will want to crush your oppressors with awesome retaliation.

8. Making them suffer is only fair. If it is considered admirable and just to "give something back" to the community when you are successful, then it must also be good to give something back to society when you suffer. If it is right to make others happy when you are happy, it must also be righteous to make others hurt when you are hurting. It is only proper that you make others feel pain when you are in pain. Making them suffer is copacetic.

9. Vengeance restores the celestial balance. Revenge ultimately resumes a basic cosmic harmony; when you have been wronged, the cosmos waits for you to restore the divine equilibrium by getting even. When you have been harmed by society, the universe itself goes out-of-kilter; only your act of retaliation can recover the primordial order. Vengeance, then, is ultimately a spiritual act. Retribution always brings something of the pagan back into modern civilization.

You need to realize that "turning the other cheek" does not make you a Christian; mercy only makes you a wimp. Spite is the mark of moral fortitude. In this cowardly age, vindictiveness is the surest sign of a man with backbone. Vengeance is the sign of the personal determination. A man proves his mettle by getting even. An individual with grit and pluck settles accounts. A man without spite is a man with substance.

The seeker of revenge always appear to outsiders as a figure of mystery. Society will never approve of your campaign of retribution, and the mundane taxpayers will always be incomprehending, but the vengeful individual will be surrounded by a curious sort of psychic energy. Vengeance does beguile all. There is no more potent force in the universe than the desire for retribution.

Revenge is the only thing that gives meaning to this reality. Retribution presents you purpose for this existence. Vengeance is the ultimate objective of life.

A real man does what he has to do. Vengeance is yours.

IT'S THE WAY YOU CHEW

by Mr. Mean-Spirited

If you don't yet despise your fellow man, just observe someone eating. If you don't yet loathe the human species, take a look at that speck of food beneath his lip. If you want to hate the entire human race, just watch another person eat an ear of corn. No one will ever again call himself a humanitarian after watching the people fill their plates in a Las Vegas buffet. Once you've listened to the noise that a senior citizen makes when he finishes a bowl of soup, you won't ever want to hear anything else that comes out of the mouth. No one can remain an idealist after being forced to witness an old man consume pudding.

THE FRAUD OF PHILANTHROPY

by Mr. Mean-Spirited

Philanthropy is just about the cruelest thing that the rich can do to the poor. The ruling class would have you believe that philanthropy involves donations to organizations claiming to eliminate societal misery, but closer examination of the practice indicates that philanthropy actually perpetuates the very same social misfortunes that it is supposed to eradicate. Although corporate generosity is supposedly done for the benefit of the general public, such philanthropy is actually a technique to keep the average American living in a state of financial servitude. Like a zookeeper with a treat in one hand, philanthropic giving is merely a con that the ruling elite plays upon a poor creature. Consider philanthropy as a sort of predatory generosity.

1: Philanthropy is all about celebrities. Philanthropy is not about the quantity of money that is supposedly donated, as much as an issue of who is doing the giving. While an ordinary citizen might offer a couple dollars to a homeless man for a meal, that action never seems to constitute philanthropy, but when John D. Rockefeller flung a dime into the hand of an impoverished child, then that is not only a philanthropic act—but also a photographic image to be eternally celebrated in mass media. Since the actual dollar amount that ever reaches the impoverished recipient is often astonishingly insignificant, it cannot be the exact sum of money that defines an act of philanthropy. Rather, the fact that the cash comes from the super rich is what transforms the pittance into a pretty, philanthropic penny. Charity is part of the posh lifestyle that transforms a person into a celebrity. It's always been fashionable for every well-bred gentleman to have a cause. Philanthropy is not something you can do; instead, philanthropy is something done to you. Philanthropy is nothing than an ordinary person can attempt—philanthropy is always done by your betters.

2: Philanthropy is a scheme to gain publicity. Just as the notion of a Rockefeller handing out coins was crafted and created by a public-relations executive—all so-called philanthropic acts are really done just for the good press. The philanthropist always waits for a video camera before his handlers tell him to begin giving. It is only when a member of the ruling clique gets caught in some extremely unethical business activity (like, say, Rockefeller crushing his competition) does the "robber baron" finally begin a calculated campaign of philanthropy. When a member of the upper crust is truly desperate to hide his sleazy practices, philanthropy will be directed toward something photogenic like child-welfare. A philanthropic act does wonders to draw media attention away from some impending scandal.

3: Philanthropic acts are really scams to gain a tax write-off. When some fast-food chain offers to give a percentage of the sale of every greasy burger to some benevolent agency—to a non-profit organization having some involvement with children, of course—the multinational corporation will use that supposed donation as a tax dodge. Strangely enough, instead of actually reducing a corporation’s net wealth by the total amount of money given away, the charitable giving always seems to end-up improving the company’s bottom line—because the sum is designed to manipulate the numbers on the tax return, rather than to help-out some unfortunates. Somehow the smug philanthropist always knows how to manipulate the tax code to his benefit.

4: Philanthropy is trick to raise prices. If a company really wanted to do something to benefit mankind, then the business would lower the price of the Wankerburger by the amount of the supposed contribution and allow each customer to make an individual decision about donation. Instead, philanthropy gives the corporation an excuse to raise prices; no customer can then legitimately question these higher charges because the extra money supposedly goes to such a good cause. Philanthropy is just an excuse that businesses use to charge you more.

Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, serves as the poster boy of the scam of using philanthropy as a pretense to increase the price of merchandise. Surely if Mr. Gates were really all that concerned about helping the impoverished, he would begin by lowering the price of his software; obviously, if Bill Gates were truly that interested in giving away his billions, he would not be charging so much for his commercial products in the first place. If Andrew Carnegie actually wanted to benefit humanity, it would have been far more efficient if he hadn't destroyed his competition in the steel industry at the beginning. If a company really were all that interested in doing "good," then surely it would have had better business practices from the start; instead, sham philanthropy is used to crush competition just as much as creating a monopoly. Philanthropy takes the element of choice from the consumer, and gives the business owner the privilege of making the decision about who gets the bounty.

5. Philanthropy is designed to perpetuate the financial dominance of particular families. Philanthropic acts are never about putting more money in the pockets of the average shopper; instead, all philanthropy does is to maintain control of financial resources by the same ruling elite. Philanthropy is all about preserving the control of wealth. Curiously enough, the super rich never just give away money—that would be too easy; instead, the ruling elite creates giant tax-exempt foundations in order to administer their supposed largess. When Rockefeller finally got tired of handing out coinage to ungrateful urchins, the family set up a foundation that, even to this very day, still dispenses the charitable handouts of this particular bloodline. 

Somehow these charities never give away all of their assets and just disappear; in contrast, their agenda involves creating some permanent entity, a legal trust that dispenses a mere trickle of the interest as a cover for its other activities. These charitable foundations are the tools that the wealthy insiders use to perpetuate their control over a share of the gross domestic product. The tax-free entities become a means to perpetuate the financial domination over the complacent, consuming public. Philanthropy is just a sneaky way for a few fortunate genetic lines to maintain eternal, everlasting control over their ill-gotten gains. Charities are the ultimate expression of corporate control of the general public.

Even after philanthropists have donated billions, not one social problem has ever been fixed. Even after all that money was supposedly given away, there is more misery than ever. Wherever philanthropists have been at work, there is always more deprivation than when they started. Philanthropists institutionalize suffering.

With philanthropists loose on the streets, you don’t need pickpockets. Beware of rich men bearing gifts.

 

YOU MISSED A SPOT

by Mr. Mean-Spirited

Hey, liberal, you can't even wipe your ass clean, but you think that you're smart enough to make society better. You can't even remove all the dried feces from your asshole, yet you imagine that you're going to make some contribution to society. You fancy that you're going to feed the hungry, yet you eat so much that you still have kernels of corn in your turd. There are shit stains on your underwear, yet you convinced that you're skilled enough to eradicate suffering. Just because you've got blood spots on your soiled toilet paper does not make you an altruist. You don't even wash your hands after you defecate, yet you believe that you're qualified to reach-out to others. Keep your own anus immaculate before you try to make the world spic and span.